Comments on: Twitterrific v. Twhirl v. IM

By: Dag T

Dag T — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 11:29:36 +0000

Great review, Kevin, thanks a lot! I’ve been twittering only for 3 weeks and I’m quite enthusiastic about this sort of “miniblog”
At the beginning I simply used ichat to get updates and to post myself but unfortunately the IM feature has been disabled by twitter… so I’ve been trying out twitterrific, I really like the black layout and the twitter sound only about it’s features I wasn’t sure at all… reading your review I think I should try out twhirl as well
Greetings from Vienna!

By: Kevin

Kevin — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 05:05:14 +0000

Niklas, here is the Sol’s blog post on what he calls Twitter Flow – http://solyoung.com/2008/03/30/flow-day-7-my-twitter-thousands/

By: Niklas Morberg

Niklas Morberg — Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:58:24 +0000

Good write-up, you wouldn’t happen to have a link to Sol’s posts on IM and twitter?

By: Whitney Hess

Whitney Hess — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 04:38:28 +0000

You’re too kind, Kevin! Thanks for the props

By: Shawn Farner

Shawn Farner — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 02:02:40 +0000

Twhirl has too many great features to pass up, and that’s why I use it. I would love to see a client much like you stated, though; one that uses xmpp for updates yet employs use of the API for other Twitter features.